Letters Column for May 2006 (Schedule Updates, Etc.)

Posted on June 1, 2006 by Jenna

← Previous | Next →

Good morning!

I’d like to tell you about some of the things that are going on here at Hitherby Dragons.

First, I am doing better.

I’d like to say that my being better means that I’ll go back to daily entries. However, it doesn’t!

I’ve started keeping a little better track of how much time goes into Hitherby, and it turns out: the reason that I’m behind on things like categorized pages, revising the bonus content for the third monthbook, updating the timeline, and, in fact, just being cool and collected when it comes to doing canon?

Hitherby is hard!

Right now, three hours a day just isn’t enough for daily entries. I spend too much time up too late trying to get posts up and not enough time organizing things and building a buffer.

So I am going to give Hitherby 15-20 hours a week. If that’s enough to post every other day, then so be it. If things get easier and I can go back to daily entries, I’ll do that.

Either way, I suspect June will be erratic.

Some other notes!

Are there any lawyers reading this who would be willing to write a letter on my behalf? Basically to the effect of “Please provide Ms. Borgstrom with a full accounting of books sold, moneys owed, etcetera?”

Everything takes much more time than it should. The RPG I promised you is coming. ^_^

The computer that many of you donated money for last year is finally here! Her name is bubbletea and she is a nice little BenQ Joybook that actually holds a battery charge! I am embarrassed that it took ten months, for which I will blame dukkha, the pervasive universal characteristic of suffering.

Speaking of which, donations for May totalled $75. Thank you!

Thank you for your kind words,

David Goldfarb
James Wallis
Penultimate Minion
Vincent Avatar

I really, really like Florensky’s //Pillar and Ground of Truth, of which the first four books are about why A = A.//
— Odious

It seems like the biggest problem with a pillar and ground of truth would be lightning. But those books sound cool. ^_^

Martin wants to create a fiction that takes the truths he sees in the world and supports them — you know, suffering is there, so he’s going to make it meaningful, not try to hide it.
— rpuchalsky

What do you mean by a fiction?

My month is complete.
— Vincent Avatar

Yay! Now you can funnel us future stock information!

Well, that is to say… it’s obviously not a god. It’s a collection of writings. But (Hitherby) seems to be a fictional effort at making sense at the world.
— Eric


I think that’s fair. Ultimately Hitherby Dragons will result in a map of Jane’s world, which is analogous but not identical to our own. Blake would suggest that in so doing, I remake the world. Borges, conversely, would just say, “Wouldn’t it be funny if she did?”

So does software stop running when the computer stops? yes. But that doesn’t stop copies of the software from running (your example of the human code interpreter is a copy of the software running on an competing computing platform). Does software stop being software when the computer stops? no. But it is not capable of running. A apt anology might be between a computer and time. A computer/interpreter running is to software as time passing is to humans.
— GoldenH

How would a human experience it, do you think, if time broke down and the universe weasels had to substitute a backup time?

(sorry, I couldn’t help but be reminded of Trotsky’s “ABC of Materialist Dialectics”)
— ADamiani

“When is a dialectic not a dialectic?”

“When it’s ajar!”

Hee hee hee hee hee hee hee hee.

(The terrible, terrible thing is that, on telling that joke, I experienced deja vu.)

But…but reforging the world is so //difficult! You have to cut Fenris’ chain and everything!//
— Ford Dent

Dude, that chain’s alloyed with bird spit. I mean, seriously. Your roto rooter will handle it.

So we see that the difference is that isn’t’s can’t have //large-scale effects. This strikes me as being like the passage of time in the Marvel and DC universes: it only works if you don’t look at it too closely. I mean, just where do you draw a line between large-scale and small-scale?//
— David Goldfarb

In fairness, dissolving under careful observation is a characteristic of most things in the real world, too. ^_^

Unfortunately, Blake forgot to document the pair of displacer beasts also in the room, who are guarding a potion of invisibility and a plus one sword.
— Eric

Oh, man, no wonder I’m not maintaining the expected wealth for my level.

Incidentally, I’ve been thinking about Martin’s brush with nonexistence in Tre Ore. My current understanding is that he nearly //defined// himself out of existence. He had already said, “…the monster’s responsibility won’t ever negate mine.” He’s trying to operate on a level beyond that of the monster.

Now, as we saw in “Questions and Answers”, the monster is capable of twisting concepts of what is right. So if Martin accepts those concepts in his self-definition (”Do you have the right to do this?” “Yes.”) then the monster automatically gains the ability to twist him. There’s no being who operates on that level, for whom “the monster’s responsibility won’t ever negate mine” is true. So Martin would be defining himself in a way that would exclude his own existence — the only way that the monster couldn’t negate him would be if he didn’t exist. It’s significant that he’s asked the question by a wogly, contradiction embodied.

Instead he says “That’s not important to me.” I.e., he rejects the concept of rights, choosing to operate on a wider level.
— David Goldfarb

That bit there is dense with meaning, isn’t it? ^_^

I think that you are close but also that even if the monster fell over dead that Martin would still have problems executing his dharma in a context of rights.

And that’s all the time I have for today! I’ll try to finish this up as soon as I can. ^_^